1. 1. Mäntylä, Mika & Graziotin, Daniel & Kuutila, Miikka. (2016). The Evolution of Sentiment Analysis - A Review of Research Topics, Venues, and Top Cited Papers. Computer Science Review. 27. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.10.002.
   2. Weaver, Jesse & Tarjan, Paul. (2013). Facebook Linked Data via the Graph API. Semantic Web. 4. 245- 250. 10.3233/SW-2012-0078.
   3. For Cosby, Ghomeshi, #MeToo and fourth wave, see Matheson, Kelsey (17 October 2017). "You Said #MeToo. Now What Are We Going To Do About It?", The Huffington Post.
   4. Dixon, Kitsy (August 2014). "Feminist Online Identity: Analyzing the Presence of Hashtag Feminism". Journal of Arts and Humanities. 3 (7): 34–40 – via OneSearch.
   5. B. Liu, “Handbook Chapter: Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing,” Handbook of Natural Language Processing. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, NY, USA, 2009.
   6. K. Dave, S. Lawrence, and D. M. Pennock, “Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews,” in Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, 2003, pp. 519–528.
   7. Natural language Processing: Using TextBlob: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2018/02/naturallanguage-processing-for-beginners-using-textblob/
   8. Hutto, C.J. & Gilbert, E.E. (2014). VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-14). Ann Arbor, MI, June 2014.
   9. Loth, Alexander. (2019). Introduction and Getting Started with Tableau. 1-23. 10.1002/9781119561996.ch1.
   10. Loth, Alexander. (2019). Visual Analytics with Tableau®. 10.1002/9781119561996.
   11. Milo, Tova & Somech, Amit. (2018). Next-Step Suggestions for Modern Interactive Data Analysis Platforms. 576-585. 10.1145/3219819.3219848.
   12. Moore, FahmeenaOdetta. (2016). Qualitative vs Quantitative Research. 10.13140/RG.2.2.34861.49128
   13. Ratner, Carl. (2002). Subjectivity and Objectivity in Qualitative Methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 3
   14. Szabolcsi, Anna. (2004). Positive Polarity – Negative Polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 22. 409-452. 10.1023/B:NALA.0000015791.00288.43.
   15. Amaral, Inês. (2017). Computational Social Sciences. 10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_41-1.
   16. Benthall, Sebastian. (2016). Philosophy of computational social science. 12. 13-30.
   17. Social sciences, Columbian Cyclopedia. (1897). Buffalo: Garretson, Cox & Company. p. 227
   18. Alvarez, R.M.. (2016). Computational social science: Discovery and prediction. 10.1017/9781316257340.
   19. Wallach, H. (2016). Conclusion: Computational social science: Toward a collaborative future. 10.1017/9781316257340.014.
   20. Fiona Jenkins & Helen Keane (2014) Gender and Feminism in the Social Sciences, Australian Feminist Studies, 29:80, 107-114
   21. Cioffi, Claudio. (2010). Computational Social Science. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2. 259 - 271. 10.1002/wics.95.